前语

接上节，在上节中，咱们学习了IBL中漫反射的部分，可是要展现PBR原料的威力，还得加上最重要的一环，便是IBL的镜面反射。

理论

咱们还是将烘托方程先搬出来。

不过，这次略有不同的是，咱们不再关注漫反射的部分，而是转向到镜面反射的部分了，也便是下面这部分

因为与辐照度卷积相同的（功能）原因，咱们无法以合理的功能实时求解积分的镜面反射部分。因此，咱们最好预核算这个积分，以得到像镜面 IBL 贴图这样的东西，用片段的法线对这张图采样并核算。可是，有一个地方有点扎手：咱们可以预核算辐照度图，是因为其积分仅依赖于iomega_ii​，并且可以将漫反射反射率常数项移出积分，但这一次，积分不仅仅取决于iomega_ii​，从 BRDF 可以看出，咱们还依赖于出射光线的方向oomega_oo​。

因为功能的限制，在实时状态下，要求解iomega_ii​与oomega_oo​的组合的积分是不可行的。一切聪明的数学家们又经过一系列的斗胆假设，认为上面镜面反射的积分近似的等于下面这个式子：

接下来，因为触及的理论过于杂乱，我要越过这些理论，留意，我要开端加快了。

咱们看卷积的榜首部分，也便是

它类似于咱们在IBL漫反射光照中得到的辐照度图，只不过这次咱们考虑粗糙度，针对不同的粗糙度，咱们生成多张辐照图，最后的成果类似于这样：

因为跟着粗糙度的添加，参与环境贴图卷积的采样向量会更涣散，导致反射更含糊，所以对于卷积的每个粗糙度等级，咱们将按顺序把含糊后的成果存储在预滤波贴图的 mipmap 中。

接下来看卷积的第二部分，也便是：

这是镜面反射积分的BRDF部分，依据BRDF函数的不同，咱们得到的是不同的预核算成果，终究的成果类似于这样的一张图：

咱们会在终究的核算镜面反射部分用到上面预核算的这两张图。接下来，咱们就看一下在THREEJS中是如何实现PBR原料的吧~

编码

首要，咱们先对卷积的榜首部分进行预核算，也便是烘托一个具有mipmap的辐照图。有过必定WebGL开发经验的同学或许知道，咱们可以经过 generateMipmaps这个API，来主动生成mipmap，可是在这里明显不适用，咱们需求手动的为mipmap每一层的图画手动的进行烘托，咱们才干精准的控制其成果。好在THREEJS为咱们供给了一个方便的形式。

预核算辐照图

首要，咱们在new出WebGLCubeRenderTarget的时候，咱们需求传入一些参数，之前咱们仅仅传入了纹理的巨细，而这里咱们需求加入一些别的选项。

再运用一个CubeCamera来捕捉不同mipmap层级下6个面的图画。

const preFilterMipmapRT = new THREE.WebGLCubeRenderTarget(prefilterRTSize, {
  magFilter: THREE.LinearFilter,
  minFilter: THREE.LinearMipMapLinearFilter,
  generateMipmaps: false,
  type: THREE.HalfFloatType,
  format: THREE.RGBAFormat,
  colorSpace: THREE.LinearSRGBColorSpace,
  depthBuffer: false,
});
const mipLevels = Math.log2(prefilterRTSize) + 1.0;
​
for (let i = 0; i < mipLevels; i++) {
  preFilterMipmapRT.texture.mipmaps.push({});
}
​
const preFilterCam: THREE.CubeCamera = new THREE.CubeCamera(
  near,
  far,
  preFilterMipmapRT
);

咱们再创建一个场景专门来烘托这个“辐照图”。

const prefilterCustomBg = new CustomBackground(
  cubeMapVert,
  prefilterFrag,
  'prefilterBg'
);
const renderIrradianceCubeScene = new THREE.Scene();
const prefilterScene = new THREE.Scene();
prefilterScene.add(prefilterCustomBg.mesh);

咱们上面用到的 prefilterFrag这个片段着色器的代码这里直接给出，其中的具体原理就不再叙述了，对此有爱好的读者可以自行查询材料。

varying vec3 vWorldPosition;
varying vec3 vWorldDirection;
uniform samplerCube envMap;
uniform float roughness;
​
const float PI = 3.14159265359;
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
float DistributionGGX(vec3 N, vec3 H, float roughness) {
  float a = roughness * roughness;
  float a2 = a * a;
  float NdotH = max(dot(N, H), 0.0);
  float NdotH2 = NdotH * NdotH;
​
  float nom = a2;
  float denom = (NdotH2 * (a2 - 1.0) + 1.0);
  denom = PI * denom * denom;
​
  return nom / denom;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// http://holger.dammertz.org/stuff/notes_HammersleyOnHemisphere.html
// efficient VanDerCorpus calculation.
float RadicalInverse_VdC(uint bits) {
  bits = (bits << 16u) | (bits >> 16u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x55555555u) << 1u) | ((bits & 0xAAAAAAAAu) >> 1u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x33333333u) << 2u) | ((bits & 0xCCCCCCCCu) >> 2u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x0F0F0F0Fu) << 4u) | ((bits & 0xF0F0F0F0u) >> 4u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x00FF00FFu) << 8u) | ((bits & 0xFF00FF00u) >> 8u);
  return float(bits) * 2.3283064365386963e-10; // / 0x100000000
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
vec2 Hammersley(uint i, uint N) {
  return vec2(float(i) / float(N), RadicalInverse_VdC(i));
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
vec3 ImportanceSampleGGX(vec2 Xi, vec3 N, float roughness) {
  float a = roughness * roughness;
​
  float phi = 2.0 * PI * Xi.x;
  float cosTheta = sqrt((1.0 - Xi.y) / (1.0 + (a * a - 1.0) * Xi.y));
  float sinTheta = sqrt(1.0 - cosTheta * cosTheta);
​
    // from spherical coordinates to cartesian coordinates - halfway vector
  vec3 H;
  H.x = cos(phi) * sinTheta;
  H.y = sin(phi) * sinTheta;
  H.z = cosTheta;
​
    // from tangent-space H vector to world-space sample vector
  vec3 up = abs(N.z) < 0.999 ? vec3(0.0, 0.0, 1.0) : vec3(1.0, 0.0, 0.0);
  vec3 tangent = normalize(cross(up, N));
  vec3 bitangent = cross(N, tangent);
​
  vec3 sampleVec = tangent * H.x + bitangent * H.y + N * H.z;
  return normalize(sampleVec);
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
void main() {
  vec3 N = normalize(vWorldPosition);
​
  // make the simplifying assumption that V equals R equals the normal 
  vec3 R = N;
  vec3 V = R;
​
  const uint SAMPLE_COUNT = 1024u;
  vec3 prefilteredColor = vec3(0.0);
  float totalWeight = 0.0;
​
  for(uint i = 0u; i < SAMPLE_COUNT; ++i) {
    // generates a sample vector that's biased towards the preferred alignment direction (importance sampling).
    vec2 Xi = Hammersley(i, SAMPLE_COUNT);
    vec3 H = ImportanceSampleGGX(Xi, N, roughness);
    vec3 L = normalize(2.0 * dot(V, H) * H - V);
​
    float NdotL = max(dot(N, L), 0.0);
    if(NdotL > 0.0) {
      // sample from the environment's mip level based on roughness/pdf
      float D = DistributionGGX(N, H, roughness);
      float NdotH = max(dot(N, H), 0.0);
      float HdotV = max(dot(H, V), 0.0);
      float pdf = D * NdotH / (4.0 * HdotV) + 0.0001;
​
      float resolution = 512.0; // resolution of source cubemap (per face)
      float saTexel = 4.0 * PI / (6.0 * resolution * resolution);
      float saSample = 1.0 / (float(SAMPLE_COUNT) * pdf + 0.0001);
​
      float mipLevel = roughness == 0.0 ? 0.0 : 0.5 * log2(saSample / saTexel);
​
      prefilteredColor += textureLod(envMap, L, mipLevel).rgb * NdotL;
      totalWeight += NdotL;
    }
  }
  prefilteredColor = prefilteredColor / totalWeight;
​
  gl_FragColor = vec4(prefilteredColor, 1.0);
}

咱们现在来烘托一下这个用于环境光镜面反射辐照图。

const renderEnvMap = () => {
  const prefilterCustomBg = new CustomBackground(
    cubeMapVert,
    prefilterFrag,
    'prefilterBg'
   );
  const prefilterScene = new THREE.Scene();
  prefilterScene.add(prefilterCustomBg.mesh);
​
  tempCubeRT.fromEquirectangularTexture(renderer, hdrTexture);
​
  prefilterCustomBg.setCubeTexture(tempCubeRT.texture);
  for (let mipmap = 0; mipmap < mipmapCount; mipmap++) {
    prefilterCustomBg.setRoughness(mipmap / (mipmapCount - 1));
​
    preFilterMipmapRT.viewport.set(
      0,
      0,
      preFilterMipmapRT.width >> mipmap,
      preFilterMipmapRT.height >> mipmap
     );
​
    preFilterCam.activeMipmapLevel = mipmap;
    preFilterCam.update(renderer, prefilterScene);
   }
};

测验预核算辐照图以及mipmap

在咱们进行下一步之前，咱们先验证一下咱们终究得到的辐照图以及mipmap是否正确。咱们编写一个用于测验的shader

顶点着色器：

varying vec2 vUv;
void main() {
  gl_Position = vec4(position, 1.0);
  vUv = uv;
}

片段着色器：

varying vec2 vUv;
uniform samplerCube envMap;
uniform float uLevel;
void main() {
  vec2 uv = vUv * vec2(4.0, 3.0);
  vec2 st = fract(uv);
  vec2 id = floor(uv);
  st = st * 2.0 - 1.0;
  vec3 color;
  vec3 dir = vec3(0.0);
  if(id.x == 1.0 && id.y == 1.0) {
    dir = normalize(vec3(st.x, st.y, -1.0));
  } else if(id.x == 0.0 && id.y == 1.0) {
    dir = normalize(vec3(-1.0, st.y, -st.x));
  } else if(id.x == 2.0 && id.y == 1.0) {
    dir = normalize(vec3(1.0, st.y, st.x));
  } else if(id.x == 3.0 && id.y == 1.0) {
    dir = normalize(vec3(-st.x, st.y, 1.0));
  } else if(id.x == 1.0 && id.y == 2.0) {
    dir = normalize(vec3(st.x, 1.0, st.y));
  } else if(id.x == 1.0 && id.y == 0.0) {
    dir = normalize(vec3(st.x, -1.0, -st.y));
  }
  color = textureLod(envMap, dir, uLevel).rgb;
​
  color = color / (color + vec3(1.0));
  color = pow(color, vec3(1.0 / 2.2));
  gl_FragColor = vec4(color, 1.0);
}

测验代码：

let debugScene: THREE.Scene;
const debugPreFilterMipMap = () => {
  debugScene = new THREE.Scene();
  const mat = new THREE.ShaderMaterial({
    vertexShader: normalVert,
    fragmentShader: debugPrefilterFrag,
    uniforms: {
      envMap: {
        value: preFilterMipmapRT.texture,
       },
      uLevel: {
        value: 0,
       },
     },
   });
  const geo = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(2, 2);
  const mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geo, mat);
  debugScene.add(mesh);
  renderer.render(debugScene, mainCamera);
};

咱们不断的调整uLevel来检查烘托出来的图片是否正确。以下是成果：

上面只展现了mipmap中前3层的图画，咱们很明显可以看出跟着mipmap层级的添加，图片越发的含糊。阐明咱们的辐照图核算正确。

接下来，咱们开端进行BRDF项积分的预核算了。

预核算BRDF积分项

还是和上面相同，理论部分就直接越过啦，咱们只需求知道这一部分需求进行预核算即可，具体的代码放在下面。

varying vec2 vUv;
const float PI = 3.14159265359;
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// http://holger.dammertz.org/stuff/notes_HammersleyOnHemisphere.html
// efficient VanDerCorpus calculation.
float RadicalInverse_VdC(uint bits) {
  bits = (bits << 16u) | (bits >> 16u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x55555555u) << 1u) | ((bits & 0xAAAAAAAAu) >> 1u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x33333333u) << 2u) | ((bits & 0xCCCCCCCCu) >> 2u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x0F0F0F0Fu) << 4u) | ((bits & 0xF0F0F0F0u) >> 4u);
  bits = ((bits & 0x00FF00FFu) << 8u) | ((bits & 0xFF00FF00u) >> 8u);
  return float(bits) * 2.3283064365386963e-10; // / 0x100000000
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
vec2 Hammersley(uint i, uint N) {
  return vec2(float(i) / float(N), RadicalInverse_VdC(i));
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
vec3 ImportanceSampleGGX(vec2 Xi, vec3 N, float roughness) {
  float a = roughness * roughness;
​
  float phi = 2.0 * PI * Xi.x;
  float cosTheta = sqrt((1.0 - Xi.y) / (1.0 + (a * a - 1.0) * Xi.y));
  float sinTheta = sqrt(1.0 - cosTheta * cosTheta);
​
    // from spherical coordinates to cartesian coordinates - halfway vector
  vec3 H;
  H.x = cos(phi) * sinTheta;
  H.y = sin(phi) * sinTheta;
  H.z = cosTheta;
​
    // from tangent-space H vector to world-space sample vector
  vec3 up = abs(N.z) < 0.999 ? vec3(0.0, 0.0, 1.0) : vec3(1.0, 0.0, 0.0);
  vec3 tangent = normalize(cross(up, N));
  vec3 bitangent = cross(N, tangent);
​
  vec3 sampleVec = tangent * H.x + bitangent * H.y + N * H.z;
  return normalize(sampleVec);
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
float GeometrySchlickGGX(float NdotV, float roughness) {
  // note that we use a different k for IBL
  float a = roughness;
  float k = (a * a) / 2.0;
​
  float nom = NdotV;
  float denom = NdotV * (1.0 - k) + k;
​
  return nom / denom;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
float GeometrySmith(vec3 N, vec3 V, vec3 L, float roughness) {
  float NdotV = max(dot(N, V), 0.0);
  float NdotL = max(dot(N, L), 0.0);
  float ggx2 = GeometrySchlickGGX(NdotV, roughness);
  float ggx1 = GeometrySchlickGGX(NdotL, roughness);
​
  return ggx1 * ggx2;
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
vec2 IntegrateBRDF(float NdotV, float roughness) {
  vec3 V;
  V.x = sqrt(1.0 - NdotV * NdotV);
  V.y = 0.0;
  V.z = NdotV;
​
  float A = 0.0;
  float B = 0.0;
​
  vec3 N = vec3(0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
​
  const uint SAMPLE_COUNT = 1024u;
  for(uint i = 0u; i < SAMPLE_COUNT; ++i) {
    // generates a sample vector that's biased towards the
    // preferred alignment direction (importance sampling).
    vec2 Xi = Hammersley(i, SAMPLE_COUNT);
    vec3 H = ImportanceSampleGGX(Xi, N, roughness);
    vec3 L = normalize(2.0 * dot(V, H) * H - V);
​
    float NdotL = max(L.z, 0.0);
    float NdotH = max(H.z, 0.0);
    float VdotH = max(dot(V, H), 0.0);
​
    if(NdotL > 0.0) {
      float G = GeometrySmith(N, V, L, roughness);
      float G_Vis = (G * VdotH) / (NdotH * NdotV);
      float Fc = pow(1.0 - VdotH, 5.0);
​
      A += (1.0 - Fc) * G_Vis;
      B += Fc * G_Vis;
    }
  }
  A /= float(SAMPLE_COUNT);
  B /= float(SAMPLE_COUNT);
  return vec2(A, B);
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
void main() {
  vec2 integratedBRDF = IntegrateBRDF(vUv.x, vUv.y);
  gl_FragColor = vec4(integratedBRDF, 0.0, 1.0);
}

与上面相同，再进行下一步之前咱们检查一下BRDF这一步的核算是否正确。

测验BRDF

测验代码如下：

const brdfRT = new THREE.WebGLRenderTarget(512, 512, {
    type: THREE.FloatType,
});
let brdfScene: THREE.Scene;
const renderBRDF = () => {
    const brdfMat = new THREE.ShaderMaterial({
        vertexShader: brdfVert,
        fragmentShader: brdfFrag,
    });
    const quadGeo = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(2, 2);
    const fullScreen = new THREE.Mesh(quadGeo, brdfMat);
    brdfScene = new THREE.Scene();
    brdfScene.add(fullScreen);
    renderer.setRenderTarget(brdfRT);
    renderer.render(brdfScene, mainCamera);
    renderer.setRenderTarget(null);
};

烘托成果如下，符合预期。

现现在再算上之前烘托的IBL漫反射部分的辐照图，咱们的准备工作就完成了。现在咱们修改咱们的PBR shader代码。终究的代码如下：

#include <common>
#include <lights_pars_begin>
vec3 fresnelSchlick(float cosTheta, vec3 F0) {
    return F0 + (1.0 - F0) * pow(clamp(1.0 - cosTheta, 0.0, 1.0), 5.0);
}
float DistributionGGX(vec3 N, vec3 H, float roughness) {
    float a = roughness * roughness;
    float a2 = a * a;
    float NdotH = max(dot(N, H), 0.0);
    float NdotH2 = NdotH * NdotH;
    float num = a2;
    float denom = (NdotH2 * (a2 - 1.0) + 1.0);
    denom = PI * denom * denom;
    return num / denom;
}
float GeometrySchlickGGX(float NdotV, float roughness) {
    float r = (roughness + 1.0);
    float k = (r * r) / 8.0;
    float num = NdotV;
    float denom = NdotV * (1.0 - k) + k;
    return num / denom;
}
float GeometrySmith(vec3 N, vec3 V, vec3 L, float roughness) {
    float NdotV = max(dot(N, V), 0.0);
    float NdotL = max(dot(N, L), 0.0);
    float ggx2 = GeometrySchlickGGX(NdotV, roughness);
    float ggx1 = GeometrySchlickGGX(NdotL, roughness);
    return ggx1 * ggx2;
}
vec3 fresnelSchlickRoughness(float cosTheta, vec3 F0, float roughness) {
    return F0 + (max(vec3(1.0 - roughness), F0) - F0) * pow(1.0 - cosTheta, 5.0);
}  
varying vec3 vNormal;
varying vec2 vUv;
varying vec3 vWorldPosition;
uniform vec3 albedo;
uniform float metallic;
uniform float roughness;
uniform float ao;
uniform samplerCube irradianceMap;
uniform samplerCube prefilterMap;
uniform sampler2D brdfLUT;
void main() {
    vec3 N = normalize(vNormal);
    vec3 V = normalize(cameraPosition - vWorldPosition);
    vec3 R = reflect(-V, N);
    vec3 F0 = vec3(0.04);
    F0 = mix(F0, albedo, metallic);
    vec3 Lo = vec3(0.0);
    vec3 WorldPos = vWorldPosition;
    PointLight pointLight;
    for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
        pointLight = pointLights[i];
            // calculate per-light radiance
        vec3 L = normalize(pointLight.position - WorldPos);
        vec3 H = normalize(V + L);
        float distance = length(pointLight.position - WorldPos);
        float attenuation = 1.0 / (distance * distance);
        vec3 radiance = pointLight.color * attenuation;
            // cook-torrance brdf
        float NDF = DistributionGGX(N, H, roughness);
        float G = GeometrySmith(N, V, L, roughness);
        vec3 F = fresnelSchlick(max(dot(H, V), 0.0), F0);
        vec3 kS = F;
        vec3 kD = vec3(1.0) - kS;
        kD *= 1.0 - metallic;
        vec3 nominator = NDF * G * F;
        float denominator = 4.0 * max(dot(N, V), 0.0) * max(dot(N, L), 0.0) + 0.001;
        vec3 specular = nominator / denominator;
            // add to outgoing radiance Lo
        float NdotL = max(dot(N, L), 0.0);
        Lo += (kD * albedo / PI + specular) * radiance * NdotL;
            // Lo += N;
    }
    vec3 F = fresnelSchlickRoughness(max(dot(N, V), 0.0), F0, roughness);
    vec3 kS = F;
    vec3 kD = 1.0 - kS;
    kD *= 1.0 - metallic;
    vec3 irradiance = textureCube(irradianceMap, N).rgb;
    vec3 diffuse = irradiance * albedo;
    const float MAX_REFLECTION_LOD = 4.0;
    vec3 prefilteredColor = textureLod(prefilterMap, R, roughness * MAX_REFLECTION_LOD).rgb;
    vec2 brdf = texture(brdfLUT, vec2(max(dot(N, V), 0.0), roughness)).rg;
    vec3 specular = prefilteredColor * (F * brdf.x + brdf.y);
    vec3 ambient = (kD * diffuse + specular) * ao;
    vec3 color = ambient + Lo;
    color = color / (color + vec3(1.0));
    color = pow(color, vec3(1.0 / 2.2));
    gl_FragColor = vec4(color, 1.0);
}

终究的成果如下：

总结

在IBL镜面反射的部分比漫反射的部分略微杂乱了一丢丢，实际上是杂乱了很多，可是因为咱们越过了理论的部分，所以看起来仅仅多了一个辐照图mipmap的生成和BRDF积分项的预核算。不过咱们也不用太过纠结啦，最后成果出来就好啦，究竟咱也不是搞理论的。

终究的代码点此检查